May 212015

This is more a quick dump of some proof-of-concept code.  We’re in the process of writing communications drivers for an energy management system, many of which need to communicate with devices like Modbus energy meters.

Traditionally I’ve just used the excellent pymodbus library with its synchronous interface for batch-processing scripts, but this time I need real-time and I need to do things asynchronously.  I can either run the synchronous client in a thread, or, use the Twisted interface.

We’re actually using Tornado for our core library, and thankfully there’s an adaptor module to allow you to use Twisted applications.  But how do you do it?  Twisted code requires quite a bit of getting used to, and I’ve still not got my head around it.  I haven’t got my head fully around Tornado either.

So how does one combine these?

The following code pulls out the first couple of registers out of a CET PMC330A energy meter that’s monitoring a few circuits in our office. It is a stripped down copy of this script.

#!/usr/bin/env python
Pymodbus Asynchronous Client Examples -- using Tornado

The following is an example of how to use the asynchronous modbus
client implementation from pymodbus.
# import needed libraries
import tornado
import tornado.platform.twisted
from twisted.internet import reactor, protocol
from pymodbus.constants import Defaults

# choose the requested modbus protocol
from pymodbus.client.async import ModbusClientProtocol
#from pymodbus.client.async import ModbusUdpClientProtocol

# configure the client logging
import logging
log = logging.getLogger()

# example requests
# simply call the methods that you would like to use. An example session
# is displayed below along with some assert checks. Note that unlike the
# synchronous version of the client, the asynchronous version returns
# deferreds which can be thought of as a handle to the callback to send
# the result of the operation.  We are handling the result using the
# deferred assert helper(dassert).
def beginAsynchronousTest(client):
    io_loop = tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.current()

    def _dump(result):'Register values: %s', result.registers)
    def _err(result):
        logging.error('Error: %s', result)

    rq = client.read_holding_registers(0, 4, unit=1)

    # close the client at some time later
    io_loop.add_timeout(io_loop.time() + 1, client.transport.loseConnection)
    io_loop.add_timeout(io_loop.time() + 2, io_loop.stop)

# choose the client you want
# make sure to start an implementation to hit against. For this
# you can use an existing device, the reference implementation in the tools
# directory, or start a pymodbus server.
defer = protocol.ClientCreator(reactor, ModbusClientProtocol
        ).connectTCP("", Defaults.Port)
May 152015

… or how to emulate Red Hat’s RPM dependency hell in Debian with Python.

There are times I love open source systems and times when it’s a real love-hate relationship. No more is this true than trying to build Python module packages for Debian.

On Gentoo this is easy: in the past we had g-pypi. I note that’s gone now and replaced with a gsourcery plug-in called gs-pypi. Both work. The latter is nice because it gives you an overlay potentially with every Python module.

Building packages for Debian in general is fiddly, but not difficult, but most Python packages follow the same structure: a script,, calls on distutils and provides a package builder and installer. You call this with some arguments, it builds the package, plops it in the right place for dpkg-buildpackage and the output gets bundled up in a .deb.

Easy. There’s even a helper script: stdeb that plugs into distutils and will do the Debian packaging all for you. However, stdeb will not source dependencies for you. You must do that yourself.

So quickly, building a package for Debian becomes reminiscent of re-living the bad old days with early releases of Red Hat Linux prior to yum/apt4rpm and finding the RPM you just obtained needs another that you’ll have to hunt down from somewhere.

Then you get the people who take the view, why have just one package builder when you can have two. fysom needs pybuilder to compile. No problems, I’ll just grab that. Checked it out of github, uhh ohh, it uses itself to build, and it needs other dependencies.

Lovely. It gets better though, those dependencies need pybuilder to build. I just love circular dependencies!

So as it turns out, in order to build this, you’ll need to enlist pip to install these behind Debian’s back (I just love doing that!) then you’ll have the dependencies needed to actually build pybuilder and ultimately fysom.

Your way out of this maze is to do the following:

  • Ensure you’ve got the python-stdeb, dh-python and python-pip packages installed.
  • Use pip to install the dependencies for pybuilder and its dependencies: pip install fluentmock pybuilder pyassert pyfix pybuilder-external-plugin-demo pybuilder_header_plugin pybuilder_release_plugin
  • Now you should be able to build pybuilder, do pyb publish in the directory, then look under target/dist/pybuilder-${VERSION} you should see the Python sources with a you can use with stdeb.

Any other dependencies are either in Debian repositories, or you can download the sources yourself and use the stdeb technique to build them.

May 032015

The Problem

I’ve been running a station from the bicycle for some time now and I suppose I’ve tried a few different battery types on the station.

Originally I ran 9Ah 12V gel cells, which work fine for about 6 months, then the load of the radio gets a bit much and I find myself taking two with me on a journey to work because one no longer lasts the day.  I replaced this with a 40Ah Thundersky LiFePO4 pack which I bought from EVWorks, which while good, weighed 8kg!  This is a lot lighter than an equivalent lead acid, gel cell or AGM battery, but it’s still a hefty load for a bicycle.

At the time that was the smallest I could get.  Eventually I found a mob that sold 10Ah packs. These particular cells were made by LiFeBatt, and while pricey, I’ve pretty much recouped my costs. (I’d have bought and disposed of about 16 gel cell batteries in this time at $50 each, versus $400 for one of these.)   These are what I’ve been running now since about mid 2011, and they’ve been pretty good for my needs.  They handle the load of the FT-857 okay on 2m FM which is what I use most of the time.

A week or two back though, I was using one of these packs outside with the home base in a “portable” set-up with my FT-897D.  Tuned up on the 40m WICEN net on 7075kHz, a few stations reported that I had scratchy audio.  Odd, the radio was known to be good, I’ve operated from the back deck before and not had problems, what changed?

The one and only thing different is I was using one of these 10Ah packs.  I’ve had fun with RF problems on the bicycle too.  On transmit, the battery was hovering around the 10.2V mark, perhaps a bit low.  Could it be the radio is distorting on voice peaks due to input current starvation?  I tried after the net swapping it for my 40Ah pack, which improved things.  Not totally cleared up, but it was better, and the pack hadn’t been charged in a while so it was probably a little low too.

The idea

I thought about the problem for a bit.  SSB requires full power on voice peaks.  For a 100W radio, that’s a 20A load right now.  Batteries don’t like this.  Perhaps there was a bit of internal resistance from age and the nature of the cells?  Could I do something to give it a little hand?

Supercapacitors are basically very high capacity electrolytic capacitors with a low breakdown voltage, normally in the order of a few volts and capacitances of over a farad.  They are good for temporarily storing charge that needs to be dumped into a load in a hurry.  Could this help?

My cells are in a series bank of 4: ~3.3V/cell with 4 cells gives me 13.2V.  There’s a battery balancer already present.  If a cell gets above 4V, that cell is toast, so the balancer is present to try to prevent that from happening.  I could buy these 1F 5.5V capacitors for only a few dollars each, so I thought, “what the hell, give it a try”.  I don’t have much information on them other that Elna Japan made them.  The plan was to make some capacitor “modules” that would hook in parallel to each cell.

My 13.2V battery pack, out of case

My 13.2V battery pack, out of its case



For my modules, the construction was simple, two reasonably heavy gauge wires tacked onto the terminals, the whole capacitor then encased in heatshrink tubing and ring lugs crimped to the leads. I was wondering whether I should solder a resistor and diode in parallel and put that in series with the supercap to prevent high in-rush current, but so far that hasn’t been necessary.

The re-assembled pack

I’ve put the pack back together and so far, it has charged up and is ready to face its first post-retrofit challenge.  I guess I’ll be trying out the HF station tomorrow to see how it goes.

Assembled pack

Assembled pack

The Verdict

Not a complete solution to the RF feedback, it seems to help in other ways. I did a quick test on the drive way first with the standard Yaesu handmic and with the headset. Headset still faces interference problems on HF, but I can wind it up to about 30W~40W now instead of 20.

More pondering to come but we’ll see what the other impacts are.