So it seems that the Same Sex Marriage postal votes are finally being sent around. This is good news in a way: we get to have a say in the matter and hopefully put the matter to bed one way or the other.
No more umming and arring, which I’m frankly sick and tired of, as I feel there are more pressing needs. Yes, it’s important, but we have two nuclear armed crazy-haired nutters at opposite sides of the Pacific ready to light the planet up like a neon light!
I’m in support of the legislation changing by the way. I think same-sex couples are entitled to the same rights, and it wasn’t that long ago that marriage was restricted to those not just of the opposite sex, but also had to be of the same “race” and religion.
To quote a song by John Williamson: “They’d chain you up to a boab tree, for kissing an Aborigine!”
So to my way of thinking, society changes. What was taboo yesterday, we don’t think twice about today. An Anglican family sending their children to a Catholic school would be heresy years ago… but for my sister and I, that is exactly what happened. The world doesn’t seem to have imploded as a result.
The status quo regarding marriage is a hang-over from when the Church was the only place where you could get married, and ruled with far greater weight than today. This is no longer the case, thus it no longer makes sense to hang onto this concept.
Anyway… my opinions on this are beside the point. In spite of the good intentions, it looks as if the postal vote envelopes overlook one serious flaw: with sufficient light they are see through!
So my proposal: Put a thin piece of card in with the postal vote to block the light. Not thick enough that it might cause the envelope to jam or interfere with sorting equipment, just opaque enough to prevent the contents being visible. A small piece of black paper would likely do the job nicely.
Sure the ABS will have a little bit more paper to dispose of, but then at least, our votes are secure and people can’t “manipulate” the vote by snooping on sealed envelopes and discard the ones that disagree with their opinions. At least then we won’t be wasting $122M.